Regrading Policy for hw2
- Request later than Sunday, Nov. 24
will not be accepted.
- Only for obvious mistake of the grader such
as miscounting lost points.
- Only when you have explicitly stated
the answers correctly but still lost point >= 0.5. (Please DO NOT
argue "implied answers, etc.".)
- Please don't come for point loss less
than 0.5
- Only when your files are unaltered
to show the original date of last modification before due time.
- No argument against the grading
standard given below.
Grading Standard for hw0
0 pt for no code submission (missing either
softcopy or hardcopy).
-3 for not using NSL
-2 for incorrect use of train and run member functions
-5 for brute force implementation or incomprehensible code
minimum 4pts with code with decent reasoning and good documentation
minimum 2pts with code of decent reasoning.
1
Not using the specified equation to justify (-.5)
Lack of qualitative justification (-.5)
Wrong answer with careful justification (-1)
Wrong answer with poor justification (-2)
2
Graphs not strictly following guideline.(-.5)
Wrong graph (-.7)
Missing Graph.(-1)
Minimum 1pt with code
3
[Needs cases of two-landmarks and three landmarks.]
Missing a case (-1)
Graphs not showing enough (-.3)
Graphs not strictly following guideline.(-.5)
Missing Graph.(-.7)