Regrading Policy for hw3
- Request later than Sunday, Dec. 15
will not be accepted.
- Only for obvious mistake of the grader
such as miscounting lost points.
- Only when you have explicitly stated
the answers correctly but still lost point >= 0.5. (Please DO NOT
argue "implied answers, etc.".)
- Please don't come for point loss
less than 0.5
- Only when your files are unaltered
to show the original date of last modification before due time.
- No argument against the grading
standard given below.
Grading Standard for hw0
0 pt for no code submission (missing
softcopy).
minimum 2 pt for on-time submitting
Comment:
What questions are asking are "qualitative descriptions" supported by "quantitative
evidence and observation". Many of you only provided only one part,
which is grave mistake
a
Segregation not precise engouth (-.4)
Incorrect segregation (-.8)
Lack of qualitative justification (-.6)
Wrong answer with careful justification (-1)
Wrong answer with poor justification (-2)
b
Imprecise assignments of types of objects to correct and incorrect response
from the system.(-.6)
Lack of explanation (-.6)
Incorrect assignments of types of objects to correct and incorrect response
from the system.(-1)
Poor explanation (-1)
Not enough evidence(-1.6)
c
Answer not quite correct (-1)
Not the answer asked for (-2)
Evidence not showing enough (-1)
No evidence (-2)
d
not coming up with uncertainty (-1)
not good explain (-1)